Who were the Valiant Characters created by.
Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg
- 400yrs
- Am I Too Old to be Licking This?
- Posts: 11484
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:55 am
- Valiant fan since: A&A #0
- Favorite character: Shadowman
- Favorite title: Harbinger
- Favorite writer: Dysart
- Favorite artist: Lapham
- Location: #champabay
Great topic. I thought alot about this after reading Doc Solar 2 and thinking about how crappy the character designs are in that book.
I'd love to know not only who created the VALIANT characters, but also who designed them.
These make alot of sense:
Don Perlin - Bloodshot;
Layton - X-O;
And of course BWS for A&A since all his stuff looks like Archer's face.
I'd love to know not only who created the VALIANT characters, but also who designed them.
These make alot of sense:
Don Perlin - Bloodshot;
Layton - X-O;
And of course BWS for A&A since all his stuff looks like Archer's face.
- Elveen
- I sell comics, I collect Valiant.
- Posts: 25252
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:44 am
- Location: Educating the future of America, or something like that
I liked all the Broadway I read (of course, it's not much) except for the S.C.R.E.A.M. stuff.iggy101us wrote:I like Fatale and Powers That Be/Star Seed.captain1stern wrote:Definitely worth checking out. Was any of the Broadway stuff particularly good?
The stories and the characters and the build up was really good.
- captain1stern
- 100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:04 pm
I think BWS had his hands on a lot of the character designs including the Eternal Warrior.400yrs wrote:Great topic. I thought alot about this after reading Doc Solar 2 and thinking about how crappy the character designs are in that book.
I'd love to know not only who created the VALIANT characters, but also who designed them.
These make alot of sense:
Don Perlin - Bloodshot;
Layton - X-O;
And of course BWS for A&A since all his stuff looks like Archer's face.
AFAIK Shooter left in April 1993. If this is the case, then he left post-Bloodshot #1 (October 1992?) didn't he? And Bloodshot #1 sold...800k copies?dave wrote:If you look at how long they lasted without that guy I think it proves how little he brought to the table.
None of his books ever sold a million copies.
- xodacia81
- Here I am, happy as a clam
- Posts: 18404
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:09 pm
- Location: East of Chicago, West of New York
Shooter left in mid to late '92. By '93, he already had Defiant up and running.yardstick wrote:AFAIK Shooter left in April 1993. If this is the case, then he left post-Bloodshot #1 (October 1992?) didn't he? And Bloodshot #1 sold...800k copies?dave wrote:If you look at how long they lasted without that guy I think it proves how little he brought to the table.
None of his books ever sold a million copies.
from the "Found the Acquisition Agreement" threadxodacia81 wrote:Shooter left in mid to late '92. By '93, he already had Defiant up and running.yardstick wrote:AFAIK Shooter left in April 1993. If this is the case, then he left post-Bloodshot #1 (October 1992?) didn't he? And Bloodshot #1 sold...800k copies?dave wrote:If you look at how long they lasted without that guy I think it proves how little he brought to the table.
None of his books ever sold a million copies.
viewtopic.php?t=31510&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=50
Hence, my assumption that Shooter was [officially] out the door in April 1993. (Not talking about if he was doing stuff on the side and not actually doing work at Voyager.) But given the above September date, I suspect he could have been doing something for them at least as late as September 1992. Of course it is distinctly possible that he stopped performing work for Voyager in April 1992 (that would be the month they began work on EW #1 for June shipment.)DJSpecter wrote:Obviously, it was the date that there was closing on a settlement between Shooter and Voyager. Whether it's so late because litigation just took that long or there were other hold up factors, I don't know the details of.dave wrote:Let's pretend that I have no idea what the significance of the April 20, 1993 date is...
remember, we're only pretending though.
Also interesting to note, is individual contracts only start on September 1, 1992 (Massarsky, Layton and Hartz get their first contracts/formal employment letters on that date).
- xodacia81
- Here I am, happy as a clam
- Posts: 18404
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:09 pm
- Location: East of Chicago, West of New York
My understanding has always been that he left around August of 92. But, that is something to ponder.yardstick wrote:from the "Found the Acquisition Agreement" threadxodacia81 wrote:Shooter left in mid to late '92. By '93, he already had Defiant up and running.yardstick wrote:AFAIK Shooter left in April 1993. If this is the case, then he left post-Bloodshot #1 (October 1992?) didn't he? And Bloodshot #1 sold...800k copies?dave wrote:If you look at how long they lasted without that guy I think it proves how little he brought to the table.
None of his books ever sold a million copies.
viewtopic.php?t=31510&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=50
Hence, my assumption that Shooter was [officially] out the door in April 1993. (Not talking about if he was doing stuff on the side and not actually doing work at Voyager.) But given the above September date, I suspect he could have been doing something for them at least as late as September 1992. Of course it is distinctly possible that he stopped performing work for Voyager in April 1992 (that would be the month they began work on EW #1 for June shipment.)DJSpecter wrote:Obviously, it was the date that there was closing on a settlement between Shooter and Voyager. Whether it's so late because litigation just took that long or there were other hold up factors, I don't know the details of.dave wrote:Let's pretend that I have no idea what the significance of the April 20, 1993 date is...
remember, we're only pretending though.
Also interesting to note, is individual contracts only start on September 1, 1992 (Massarsky, Layton and Hartz get their first contracts/formal employment letters on that date).
- dave
- Turok #12 is the 1st appearance of Turok
- Posts: 8233
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 4:06 pm
- Valiant fan since: Bloodshot #1
- Favorite character: Rai
- Favorite title: Harbinger
- Favorite writer: BWS
- Location: Hiding in the fetal position
For the record I was totally joking. X-men #1 sold millions as well and so did other 90's books, so we all know that selling many copies does not automatically equal good product, however...saying Jim was around for Bloodshot #1 (which I don't believe is true) and then mentioning the print run of Bloodshot as 800 thousand is a strange way to bolster your argument.yardstick wrote:AFAIK Shooter left in April 1993. If this is the case, then he left post-Bloodshot #1 (October 1992?) didn't he? And Bloodshot #1 sold...800k copies?dave wrote:If you look at how long they lasted without that guy I think it proves how little he brought to the table.
None of his books ever sold a million copies.
To be clear - I credit Jim with spearheading the very best of VALIANT. His vision, his direction, his "talent scouting" if you will, his dedication and willingness to spend his own money; I think that all lead to the creation of the books we love so well.
That would certainly indicate that his last work was done in April of 1992, which fits with the conjecture about EW #1, not to mention Rai 0, Bloodshot/Rising Spirit, Turok, and other characters/titles.DJSpecter wrote:Sorry if that was misleading. He was certainly out of the building before September 1992.
The settlement of money/stocks etc seems to have taken at least 8 months to finalize.