Rai Theory
Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg
- Keith
- Rockin' out in Torquehalla
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:01 am
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Timewalker
- Favorite title: FVLs Archer & Armstrong
- Favorite writer: FVL
- Location: Saint Louis
Re: Rai Theory
Interesting theory there. I'd add that Clem was still plugged into whatever PRSs was doing to him. Perhaps the nanites made their way to him...
Good Morning, that's a nice tnetennba.
The thing about Arsenal is they always try to walk it in...
The thing about Arsenal is they always try to walk it in...
- BugsySig
- I could be talking poo-doo.
- Posts: 9554
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:47 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Ivar, Timewalker
- Favorite title: Harbinger/Timewalker
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart/FVL
- Favorite artist: Joe Quesada
- Location: Central CT
Re: Rai Theory
I took that as him being held unconscious because of his ability to control minds. Not something a cell could hold. May have been similar to what Pete was hooked up to in Harby #9.Keith wrote:Interesting theory there. I'd add that Clem was still plugged into whatever PRSs was doing to him. Perhaps the nanites made their way to him...
Kurt Busiek wrote:Bull$#!t

- The Dirt Gang
- Just jumpin' through time arcs, that's all.
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:33 am
- Valiant fan since: VH1 Unity #1
- Favorite writer: Shooter/Dysart
- Favorite artist: BWS
- Location: Astral Plane
- Contact:
Re: Rai Theory
From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Multum In Parvo
- greg
- The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
- Posts: 22885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39 am
- Valiant fan since: Rai #0
- Favorite character: Depends on title
- Favorite title: Depends on writer
- Favorite writer: Depends on artist
- Favorite artist: Depends on character
- Location: Indoors
- Contact:
Re: Rai Theory
I took it to mean "#5" in general (since X-O #5 already had Ninjak, it's like he was giving an example).The Dirt Gang wrote:From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Perhaps he did mean X-O #5, but I don't see anyone who could be Rai in the story. (Almost no one survives!)

I thought Dinesh was pointing out how #5 was important, and we hadn't necessarily noticed/known HOW important across all the new titles.
- BugsySig
- I could be talking poo-doo.
- Posts: 9554
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:47 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Ivar, Timewalker
- Favorite title: Harbinger/Timewalker
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart/FVL
- Favorite artist: Joe Quesada
- Location: Central CT
Re: Rai Theory
#5 showed the Bleeding Monk escaping the Harbinger Foundation...greg wrote:I took it to mean "#5" in general (since X-O #5 already had Ninjak, it's like he was giving an example).The Dirt Gang wrote:From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Perhaps he did mean X-O #5, but I don't see anyone who could be Rai in the story. (Almost no one survives!)![]()
I thought Dinesh was pointing out how #5 was important, and we hadn't necessarily noticed/known HOW important across all the new titles.

Kurt Busiek wrote:Bull$#!t

- The Dirt Gang
- Just jumpin' through time arcs, that's all.
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:33 am
- Valiant fan since: VH1 Unity #1
- Favorite writer: Shooter/Dysart
- Favorite artist: BWS
- Location: Astral Plane
- Contact:
Re: Rai Theory
Dinesh: "If someone was to hide something somewhere in the Valiant books, Rob would be a very likely candidate. I'm just saying. I'm not putting 2 and 2 together. I'm just saying."greg wrote:I took it to mean "#5" in general (since X-O #5 already had Ninjak, it's like he was giving an example).The Dirt Gang wrote:From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Perhaps he did mean X-O #5, but I don't see anyone who could be Rai in the story. (Almost no one survives!)![]()
I thought Dinesh was pointing out how #5 was important, and we hadn't necessarily noticed/known HOW important across all the new titles.
Now maybe he isn't putting 2 and 2 together but it seemed like a 'wink, wink' sort of statement to me.
Multum In Parvo
- BugsySig
- I could be talking poo-doo.
- Posts: 9554
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:47 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Ivar, Timewalker
- Favorite title: Harbinger/Timewalker
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart/FVL
- Favorite artist: Joe Quesada
- Location: Central CT
Re: Rai Theory
Well Rai could have been on one of the Vine colony ships.The Dirt Gang wrote:Dinesh: "If someone was to hide something somewhere in the Valiant books, Rob would be a very likely candidate. I'm just saying. I'm not putting 2 and 2 together. I'm just saying."greg wrote:I took it to mean "#5" in general (since X-O #5 already had Ninjak, it's like he was giving an example).The Dirt Gang wrote:From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Perhaps he did mean X-O #5, but I don't see anyone who could be Rai in the story. (Almost no one survives!)![]()
I thought Dinesh was pointing out how #5 was important, and we hadn't necessarily noticed/known HOW important across all the new titles.
Now maybe he isn't putting 2 and 2 together but it seemed like a 'wink, wink' sort of statement to me.
Kurt Busiek wrote:Bull$#!t

- greg
- The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
- Posts: 22885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39 am
- Valiant fan since: Rai #0
- Favorite character: Depends on title
- Favorite title: Depends on writer
- Favorite writer: Depends on artist
- Favorite artist: Depends on character
- Location: Indoors
- Contact:
Re: Rai Theory
Ahhhh... yes, I forgot the "Rob" part. So... X-O... and maybe #5 isn't the clue, maybe "important to the original Valiant" is the clue... like Solar #10, or Magnus #12... X-O #10 or #12? Or earlier? X-O #4 (just like 1992)?The Dirt Gang wrote:Dinesh: "If someone was to hide something somewhere in the Valiant books, Rob would be a very likely candidate. I'm just saying. I'm not putting 2 and 2 together. I'm just saying."greg wrote:I took it to mean "#5" in general (since X-O #5 already had Ninjak, it's like he was giving an example).The Dirt Gang wrote:From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Perhaps he did mean X-O #5, but I don't see anyone who could be Rai in the story. (Almost no one survives!)![]()
I thought Dinesh was pointing out how #5 was important, and we hadn't necessarily noticed/known HOW important across all the new titles.
Now maybe he isn't putting 2 and 2 together but it seemed like a 'wink, wink' sort of statement to me.

X-O #4 is the first Alexander. Surely that's a red herring with regard to Rai, right?

- greg
- The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
- Posts: 22885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39 am
- Valiant fan since: Rai #0
- Favorite character: Depends on title
- Favorite title: Depends on writer
- Favorite writer: Depends on artist
- Favorite artist: Depends on character
- Location: Indoors
- Contact:
Re: Rai Theory
Yes, but that wasn't the "first" anything.BugsySig wrote:#5 showed the Bleeding Monk escaping the Harbinger Foundation...greg wrote:I took it to mean "#5" in general (since X-O #5 already had Ninjak, it's like he was giving an example).The Dirt Gang wrote:From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Perhaps he did mean X-O #5, but I don't see anyone who could be Rai in the story. (Almost no one survives!)![]()
I thought Dinesh was pointing out how #5 was important, and we hadn't necessarily noticed/known HOW important across all the new titles.

- The Dirt Gang
- Just jumpin' through time arcs, that's all.
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:33 am
- Valiant fan since: VH1 Unity #1
- Favorite writer: Shooter/Dysart
- Favorite artist: BWS
- Location: Astral Plane
- Contact:
Re: Rai Theory
That thought had crossed my mind but I've not been home to check out the books.BugsySig wrote:Well Rai could have been on one of the Vine colony ships.The Dirt Gang wrote:Dinesh: "If someone was to hide something somewhere in the Valiant books, Rob would be a very likely candidate. I'm just saying. I'm not putting 2 and 2 together. I'm just saying."greg wrote:I took it to mean "#5" in general (since X-O #5 already had Ninjak, it's like he was giving an example).The Dirt Gang wrote:From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Perhaps he did mean X-O #5, but I don't see anyone who could be Rai in the story. (Almost no one survives!)![]()
I thought Dinesh was pointing out how #5 was important, and we hadn't necessarily noticed/known HOW important across all the new titles.
Now maybe he isn't putting 2 and 2 together but it seemed like a 'wink, wink' sort of statement to me.
Multum In Parvo
- BugsySig
- I could be talking poo-doo.
- Posts: 9554
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:47 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Ivar, Timewalker
- Favorite title: Harbinger/Timewalker
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart/FVL
- Favorite artist: Joe Quesada
- Location: Central CT
Re: Rai Theory
I've looked before. It's too vague to tell anything specific.The Dirt Gang wrote:That thought had crossed my mind but I've not been home to check out the books.BugsySig wrote:Well Rai could have been on one of the Vine colony ships.The Dirt Gang wrote:Dinesh: "If someone was to hide something somewhere in the Valiant books, Rob would be a very likely candidate. I'm just saying. I'm not putting 2 and 2 together. I'm just saying."greg wrote:I took it to mean "#5" in general (since X-O #5 already had Ninjak, it's like he was giving an example).The Dirt Gang wrote:From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Perhaps he did mean X-O #5, but I don't see anyone who could be Rai in the story. (Almost no one survives!)![]()
I thought Dinesh was pointing out how #5 was important, and we hadn't necessarily noticed/known HOW important across all the new titles.
Now maybe he isn't putting 2 and 2 together but it seemed like a 'wink, wink' sort of statement to me.
First Bleeding Monk walkinggreg wrote:Yes, but that wasn't the "first" anything.BugsySig wrote:#5 showed the Bleeding Monk escaping the Harbinger Foundation...greg wrote:I took it to mean "#5" in general (since X-O #5 already had Ninjak, it's like he was giving an example).The Dirt Gang wrote:From the podcast, it sounded like Dinesh was heavily insinuating some connection in XO#5. Did I hear that right?
Perhaps he did mean X-O #5, but I don't see anyone who could be Rai in the story. (Almost no one survives!)![]()
I thought Dinesh was pointing out how #5 was important, and we hadn't necessarily noticed/known HOW important across all the new titles.

Kurt Busiek wrote:Bull$#!t

- Chiclo
- I'm Chiclo. My strong Dongs paid off well.
- Posts: 22007
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 1:09 am
- Favorite character: Kris
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: Rai Theory
I get the feeling that Chainsaw is going to be a predecessor to HARD Corps.greg wrote:This theory is a bit out there as well...
On the OTV 100 podcast, Dinesh said that first appearances tend to match the original Valiant numbering, specifically #5 (first Rai in a story in Magnus #5).
VEI puts some emphasis on the new #5 issues...
X-O #5 was first Ninjak
A&A #5 was first (more than cameo) Eternal Warrior
Harbinger #5 has Livewire turning against Harada (surely the start of something else for Livewire)
...so... Bloodshot #5 has?
In Bloodshot #5, Bloodshot is meditating in a very "Rai-like" position and "talking" with the nanites.
Specifically mentioned is that the nanites (little boy visualization) want to know what "Waking up" and "Sleeping" are like.
Perhaps the nanites gain not only sentience but also a physical body at some point.
The importance of Bloodshot #5 would be that what/who eventually becomes Rai is first established by the "waking up" discussion.
Bloodshot #5 also has Chainsaw... which could be an imperfect version of creating/using a body for another protocol.
Rai could be the end result of that type of research, when a body separated from Bloodshot is created/used for the nanites' own sentience.
There's also a drop of blood in the Project Rising Spirit system... that one drop may be all that's needed to "grow" apart from Bloodshot.
As the little boy says in that panel, "Someday..."
- ErikG
- If you gave Aric hugs and kisses, would it be XOXO X-O?
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 4:50 pm
- Valiant fan since: Magnus Robot Fighter #1
- Favorite character: Love 'em all!
- Favorite title: Currently: Harbinger
- Favorite writer: Still Jim Shooter
- Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Re: Rai Theory
And maybe, just maybe, the Bleeding Monk is Rai? (Time travel anyone?)
- BugsySig
- I could be talking poo-doo.
- Posts: 9554
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:47 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Ivar, Timewalker
- Favorite title: Harbinger/Timewalker
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart/FVL
- Favorite artist: Joe Quesada
- Location: Central CT
Re: Rai Theory
So I went back to XO #1 and picked this out...I posted the screen grab to my Tumblr:
http://bugsysig.tumblr.com/image/48066528412
That gentleman does seem to be wearing Samurai style garb and is very pale...
http://bugsysig.tumblr.com/image/48066528412
That gentleman does seem to be wearing Samurai style garb and is very pale...

Kurt Busiek wrote:Bull$#!t

- nscc
- Nanite-powered posting
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:28 am
- Valiant fan since: 1993
- Favorite title: X-O/Harby/A+A/Unity
- Favorite writer: Vditti/Dysart/FVL/Kindt
- Favorite artist: soo many pretty pictures...
- Location: nova scotia Canada
Re: Rai Theory
If Rai was in X-o 5, it would have to be.... the little girl who talks to Aric after he lands.
I remember reading (or think I do) about how the direction they are going with Rai could be controversial. I'm sure that would cause some really cool brain explosions if Rai was in current time as an 8 year old girl wandering the land dishing out pain on bad guys as only an 8 year old with the blood of heroes could!
I remember reading (or think I do) about how the direction they are going with Rai could be controversial. I'm sure that would cause some really cool brain explosions if Rai was in current time as an 8 year old girl wandering the land dishing out pain on bad guys as only an 8 year old with the blood of heroes could!

Where are we going and why am I in this hand-basket?
- greg
- The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
- Posts: 22885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39 am
- Valiant fan since: Rai #0
- Favorite character: Depends on title
- Favorite title: Depends on writer
- Favorite writer: Depends on artist
- Favorite artist: Depends on character
- Location: Indoors
- Contact:
Re: Rai Theory
D.C. already made Rai as a girl. They call her Katana and she never looked like Rai until Valiant returned.nscc wrote:If Rai was in X-o 5, it would have to be.... the little girl who talks to Aric after he lands.
I remember reading (or think I do) about how the direction they are going with Rai could be controversial. I'm sure that would cause some really cool brain explosions if Rai was in current time as an 8 year old girl wandering the land dishing out pain on bad guys as only an 8 year old with the blood of heroes could!

http://www.entertainmentearth.com/image ... 0112lg.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Dr. Solar
- Spanked like a 4 year old in K-Mart.
- Posts: 10898
- Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 8:09 pm
- Favorite character: Sven
- Favorite title: Psi-Lords #2
- Location: Los Angeles Surviving Sectors
Re: Rai Theory
I took Dino's comment not to mean that "issue #5's" were important, but that they were trying to mirror how new characters appeared in other books, and approximately the issues they appeared in.
Ninjak appeared in Bloodshot #6 the first time around, and X-O #5 this time around.
HARDCorps appeared in Harbinger #10 the first time around. Have we scoured this Harbinger 10 to see if there are any hints of anything? Will Harby Wars 3 be their true first appearance this time around?
Ninjak appeared in Bloodshot #6 the first time around, and X-O #5 this time around.
HARDCorps appeared in Harbinger #10 the first time around. Have we scoured this Harbinger 10 to see if there are any hints of anything? Will Harby Wars 3 be their true first appearance this time around?
- greg
- The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
- Posts: 22885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39 am
- Valiant fan since: Rai #0
- Favorite character: Depends on title
- Favorite title: Depends on writer
- Favorite writer: Depends on artist
- Favorite artist: Depends on character
- Location: Indoors
- Contact:
Re: Rai Theory
...and Rai appeared in #5 (or #4 as a card) the first time... so if Dinesh was hinting that Rai might already be somewhere, it would be near #5.Dr. Solar wrote:I took Dino's comment not to mean that "issue #5's" were important, but that they were trying to mirror how new characters appeared in other books, and approximately the issues they appeared in.
Ninjak appeared in Bloodshot #6 the first time around, and X-O #5 this time around.
HARDCorps appeared in Harbinger #10 the first time around. Have we scoured this Harbinger 10 to see if there are any hints of anything? Will Harby Wars 3 be their true first appearance this time around?
- lorddunlow
- I think you might be a closeted Canadian.
- Posts: 13592
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:51 pm
Re: Rai Theory
So we just need to look in VEI's Magnus #5 and he'll be there? 

*SQUEE* your science, I have a machine gun.
- nscc
- Nanite-powered posting
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:28 am
- Valiant fan since: 1993
- Favorite title: X-O/Harby/A+A/Unity
- Favorite writer: Vditti/Dysart/FVL/Kindt
- Favorite artist: soo many pretty pictures...
- Location: nova scotia Canada
Re: Rai Theory
Wow. Now that is a sneaky first appearance. A Different publisher.greg wrote:D.C. already made Rai as a girl. They call her Katana and she never looked like Rai until Valiant returned.nscc wrote:If Rai was in X-o 5, it would have to be.... the little girl who talks to Aric after he lands.
I remember reading (or think I do) about how the direction they are going with Rai could be controversial. I'm sure that would cause some really cool brain explosions if Rai was in current time as an 8 year old girl wandering the land dishing out pain on bad guys as only an 8 year old with the blood of heroes could!
http://www.entertainmentearth.com/image ... 0112lg.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Where are we going and why am I in this hand-basket?
- Keith
- Rockin' out in Torquehalla
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:01 am
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Timewalker
- Favorite title: FVLs Archer & Armstrong
- Favorite writer: FVL
- Location: Saint Louis
Re: Rai Theory
That could definitely be it. Just seemed to me that, with the size of the frame showing him in the contraption and Cloud's reaction, the intent was to point out that PRS was doing something to Clem. But, of course, that's my speculation...BugsySig wrote:I took that as him being held unconscious because of his ability to control minds. Not something a cell could hold. May have been similar to what Pete was hooked up to in Harby #9.Keith wrote:Interesting theory there. I'd add that Clem was still plugged into whatever PRSs was doing to him. Perhaps the nanites made their way to him...

Good Morning, that's a nice tnetennba.
The thing about Arsenal is they always try to walk it in...
The thing about Arsenal is they always try to walk it in...
- nutflush76
- Nanite-powered posting
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:29 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Bloodshot
- Favorite title: Rai
- Favorite writer: Robert Venditti
- Favorite artist: Clayton Crain
- Location: Palm Desert, ca.
Re: Rai Theory
I have no idea who the new Rai would be, but I prefer him to be modeled more after the first Rai rather than any of the following Rais.
It would be cool to see Bloodshot survive into the future, just not as Rai. This wouldn't be totally unprecedented since Gilad and his brothers appear in the future in the original universe. Except Armstrong, he disappears from earth at some point in Rai #0.
Speaking of Rai #0 we could also see a similar book to introduce a new Rai. Another Rai #0 which would tie the present to the future in a similar fashion to the original Rai #0. Then, the series could start right from Rai #1 and continue on from where #0 left off, making it a true #0 both chronologically and numerically.
It would be cool to see Bloodshot survive into the future, just not as Rai. This wouldn't be totally unprecedented since Gilad and his brothers appear in the future in the original universe. Except Armstrong, he disappears from earth at some point in Rai #0.
Speaking of Rai #0 we could also see a similar book to introduce a new Rai. Another Rai #0 which would tie the present to the future in a similar fashion to the original Rai #0. Then, the series could start right from Rai #1 and continue on from where #0 left off, making it a true #0 both chronologically and numerically.
- chriskay99
- You gotta have Faith!
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 10:48 pm
- Favorite character: Shadowman
- Favorite title: X-O Manowar
- Location: The surrounding metropolitan area of Los Angeles, CA
Re: Rai Theory
I never read the original Eternal Warrior that much, but I always thought this way about VH1 Gilad being in both the present and part of the Future Force. I highly doubt it's Bloodshot but I am digging Greg's theory about the nanite gaining sentience.lorddunlow wrote:The only negative I see to this, if I'm right is that it would be a slight detriment to the Bloodshot series' storytelling. If you know he lives to 4001, then you could never really worry about him dying (although, I admit, I don't worry much about it now - what would it take to kill this version of Bloodshot really?)
Black Science. Lazarus. Birthright. Saga. Manifest Destiny. Deadly Class.
- bygranddesign
- it sounds like "chuffed" goes both ways
- Posts: 3384
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:53 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Peter Stanchek
- Favorite title: Harbinger
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart
- Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Re: Rai Theory
4001 timeline doesn't have to be part of the present day timeline - it could be one possible future
Multiverse theory is all about the idea of many multiple timelines some slightly different and some very different from each other. Assuming Ivar has been time traveling for thousands of years he most likely created millions of time line variations himself.
That might seem like a cop out ... And you might feel like why do you care about a future timeline that possibly doesn't link to the present timeline ... But what I would do is introduce some present day characters that we like (Cronus - gen zero, Mary Maria...etc) into a Possible future. (This could possibly happen via the faraway, Ivar or the Gen Zero character Wee Mack - the travelor, bleeding monk)
So the future timeline could have two main narratives
1) the basic story of dealing with whatever crazy stuff is happening in 4001
2) the present day characters dealing with this bleak future (or maybe not so bleak) and contemplating, questioning their role in this future and all the timey wimey stuff that brings and whether they should or could go back to their present timeline and perhaps try to make changes/prevent certain events from happenning.
Multiverse theory is all about the idea of many multiple timelines some slightly different and some very different from each other. Assuming Ivar has been time traveling for thousands of years he most likely created millions of time line variations himself.
That might seem like a cop out ... And you might feel like why do you care about a future timeline that possibly doesn't link to the present timeline ... But what I would do is introduce some present day characters that we like (Cronus - gen zero, Mary Maria...etc) into a Possible future. (This could possibly happen via the faraway, Ivar or the Gen Zero character Wee Mack - the travelor, bleeding monk)
So the future timeline could have two main narratives
1) the basic story of dealing with whatever crazy stuff is happening in 4001
2) the present day characters dealing with this bleak future (or maybe not so bleak) and contemplating, questioning their role in this future and all the timey wimey stuff that brings and whether they should or could go back to their present timeline and perhaps try to make changes/prevent certain events from happenning.
Ha! Yeah! Nice! Any of those dudes in your head mosh?! - Flamingo
- BugsySig
- I could be talking poo-doo.
- Posts: 9554
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:47 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Ivar, Timewalker
- Favorite title: Harbinger/Timewalker
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart/FVL
- Favorite artist: Joe Quesada
- Location: Central CT
Re: Rai Theory
I don't want another Marvel type Multiverse. I liked that 4001 was the definitive future of the VALIANT U. It has some continuity drawbacks, but if its far enough in the future (like 2000 years) and you keep a few things about the past vague, then it shouldn't be an issue.bygranddesign wrote:4001 timeline doesn't have to be part of the present day timeline - it could be one possible future
Multiverse theory is all about the idea of many multiple timelines some slightly different and some very different from each other. Assuming Ivar has been time traveling for thousands of years he most likely created millions of time line variations himself.
That might seem like a cop out ... And you might feel like why do you care about a future timeline that possibly doesn't link to the present timeline ... But what I would do is introduce some present day characters that we like (Cronus - gen zero, Mary Maria...etc) into a Possible future. (This could possibly happen via the faraway, Ivar or the Gen Zero character Wee Mack - the travelor, bleeding monk)
So the future timeline could have two main narratives
1) the basic story of dealing with whatever crazy stuff is happening in 4001
2) the present day characters dealing with this bleak future (or maybe not so bleak) and contemplating, questioning their role in this future and all the timey wimey stuff that brings and whether they should or could go back to their present timeline and perhaps try to make changes/prevent certain events from happenning.
You can still have present day characters pay a visit, but there is something cool about a future that you can't avoid, that is not changeable by any action one takes. Maybe a visit to the future drives a character to do something, but in the end it only helps lead to that future.
One theory about a time traveller, like Ivar, is that visits to different times always took place and always resulted in that outcome. Otherwise you create too many paradoxes. You know, wibbly-wobbly-timey-wimey stuff.
Kurt Busiek wrote:Bull$#!t
