The Book of Geomancers

BloodOfHeroes · Post by **BloodOfHeroes** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 5:11 pm

cjv wrote:Here is a question. Does the information in the Valiant wiki indicate the direction that VEI is going to take when it comes to restarting/continuing the Valiant Universe? IE, if something is mentioned in the Valiant wiki, is it "gospel" when it comes to VEI? For example, Unity and Rai 0 events are mentioned, but post Unity stuff doesn't really seem to be listed. Nor is stuff from Unity 2000. Does that mean anything?

Chris

I think that all the VH-2 properties that are listed are "Independent." Which speaks volumes. So I would assume U2K would also be "independent" and separate from VALIANT continuity.

That makes me happier than an emoticon can convey!

BoH

Geomancer · Post by **Geomancer** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:08 pm

BloodOfHeroes wrote:
cjv wrote:Here is a question. Does the information in the Valiant wiki indicate the direction that VEI is going to take when it comes to restarting/continuing the Valiant Universe? IE, if something is mentioned in the Valiant wiki, is it "gospel" when it comes to VEI? For example, Unity and Rai 0 events are mentioned, but post Unity stuff doesn't really seem to be listed. Nor is stuff from Unity 2000. Does that mean anything?

Chris
I think that all the VH-2 properties that are listed are "Independent." Which speaks volumes. So I would assume U2K would also be "independent" and separate from VALIANT continuity.

That makes me happier than an emoticon can convey!

BoH

Thats the biggest thing I noticed about the Valiant site today.

I did enjoy Acclaim material, but I am very excited to see that the direction seems to be a direct continuation of original Valiant.

superman-prime · Post by **superman-prime** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:10 pm

Id much reather they ignore v2 all together

Daniel Jackson · Post by **Daniel Jackson** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:14 pm

superman-prime wrote:Id much reather they ignore v2 all together

Not me. Granted there was a lot of bad stuff in there, but some of it is definitley worth saving.

superman-prime · Post by **superman-prime** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:15 pm

Make it valiant universe 2 like dcs alternate earths

Daniel Jackson · Post by **Daniel Jackson** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:18 pm

superman-prime wrote:Make it valiant universe 2 like dcs alternate earths

Works for me, as long they don't get rid of them.

superman-prime · Post by **superman-prime** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:21 pm

Get the monitors in here

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:22 pm

superman-prime wrote:Get the monitors in here

Bunch of Watchers wanna-bees.

superman-prime · Post by **superman-prime** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:24 pm

Naa dc is better

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:26 pm

superman-prime wrote:Naa dc is better

Used to be, until they brought back the multiverse and started getting rid of stuff from the last 20 years to make things more like they were in the 60's.

cjv · Post by **cjv** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:36 pm

dino wrote:
cjv wrote:Here is a question. Does the information in the Valiant wiki indicate the direction that VEI is going to take when it comes to restarting/continuing the Valiant Universe? IE, if something is mentioned in the Valiant wiki, is it "gospel" when it comes to VEI? For example, Unity and Rai 0 events are mentioned, but post Unity stuff doesn't really seem to be listed. Nor is stuff from Unity 2000. Does that mean anything?

Chris
The Book of Geomancer is a summary of the published history of the Valiant Universe and is written by everyone. It is not company gospel and may or may not indicate the direction of future stories (depending on what you write )

Nice bet hedging.

Chris

Ryan · Post by **Ryan** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:10 pm

imagesowner2 wrote: Ryan

Can I use my Kitty as my avatar on the VEI site?

yeah i think that message board is just a portal to this site. The kitty should be fine

BloodOfHeroes · Post by **BloodOfHeroes** » Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:14 am

HUGE props and gratitude to MOTA, who's been helping me learn how to "wiki."

Thanks, man. I'll figure it out some day!

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:17 am

BloodOfHeroes wrote:HUGE props and gratitude to MOTA, who's been helping me learn how to "wiki."

Thanks, man. I'll figure it out some day!

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:24 am

401 character entries

JustCallMeAric · Post by **JustCallMeAric** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 am

ManofTheAtom wrote:401 character entries

Eres un animal

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:58 am

JustCallMeAric wrote:
ManofTheAtom wrote:401 character entries
Eres un animale

No las hice todas yo, jej. Hice probablemente como 300 o algo asi, jej

JustCallMeAric · Post by **JustCallMeAric** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:09 pm

ManofTheAtom wrote:
JustCallMeAric wrote:
ManofTheAtom wrote:401 character entries
Eres un animale
No las hice todas yo, jej. Hice probablemente como 300 o algo asi, jej

That is still a lot.

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:10 pm

JustCallMeAric wrote:
ManofTheAtom wrote:
JustCallMeAric wrote:
ManofTheAtom wrote:401 character entries
Eres un animale
No las hice todas yo, jej. Hice probablemente como 300 o algo asi, jej
That is still a lot.

Heh, yes it is.

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:39 pm

Today, on the Book of Geomancers:

Geomancer#7 & #8

And

Eternal Warrior#28,#29, #30 , & #31

(Re: Eternal Warrior #31.

As a writer who is working on a King Arthur-inspired graphic novel, I can't help but feel offended at Ostrander's blatant ignorance of the myth.

It was the Battle of Camlann, not Camian, and there is no logic in Gilad ever having been King Arthur.

Just gotta remember, this is the same "professional writer" who couldn't get the name of Synchron straight).

Updated

Samantha McHenry

Silver Cane

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:23 pm

Today, at the Book of Geomancers:

Eternal Warrior#32 - #34

(Re: Eternal Warrior #33.

Once again, Ostrander shows his ignorance and calls Neville Alcott "Neville Sinclair", while the penciller drew someone who was neither Neville NOR Sinclair.

Unlike the error in the previous summary, I'm not gonna address this screw up in the summary.

They replaced Vanhook with this guy? He couldn't even bother to properly research what he was writing!

Note to VEI: Don't be fooled by a writer or editor's populary, find talented people who will commit to the work, not prima donnas looking to cash a paycheck).

Updated

Migdalia De Los Santos

Jack The Ripper

New Entry

James Durant

************

Timewalker#1 - #3

New Entries

Mac

Angel Prometheus

Updated

Ivar Anni-Padda

Ryan · Post by **Ryan** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:12 pm

ManofTheAtom wrote:As a writer who is working on a King Arthur-inspired graphic novel, I can't help but feel offended at Ostrander's blatant ignorance of the myth.

It was the Battle of Camlann, not Camian, and there is no logic in Gilad ever having been King Arthur.

Just gotta remember, this is the same "professional writer" who couldn't get the name of Synchron straight).

Not to turn this into a 'bag on Ostrander' thread, but I always hated all his little mistakes in Magnus (i.e. 'Cloud Cloddies' was suddenly 'Cloud Cloppies'

)

carry on.

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:06 pm

Today, at the Book of Geomancers:

Timewalker#4 - #7

ManofTheAtom · Post by **ManofTheAtom** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:35 pm

I'm sick, so there will be no more updates from me until further notice

Sorry

Geomancer · Post by **Geomancer** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:44 pm

ManofTheAtom wrote:I'm sick, so there will be no more updates from me until further notice

Sorry

Hope you feel better soon, wiki updates or not.

But as for the wiki material - excellent work!