Unity 2000 Question
Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg
-
OneArmedBandit
- 100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Unity 2000 Question
Picked up a copy of Unity 2000 #1 with the blue cover bagged with #2. Is it wise to leave the books sealed together? Just curious. I know it’s probably a rookie question, but would like to hear your opinions. BTW got it for a cool 25 cents, so I don't think I did to badly.
-
Eric Jackson
- You gotta have Faith!
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 9:40 pm
- Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
-
greg
- The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
- Posts: 22881
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39 am
- Valiant fan since: Rai #0
- Favorite character: Depends on title
- Favorite title: Depends on writer
- Favorite writer: Depends on artist
- Favorite artist: Depends on character
- Location: Indoors
- Contact:
Re: Unity 2000 Question
Since you mentioned it was a "rookie question"...OneArmedBandit wrote:Picked up a copy of Unity 2000 #1 with the blue cover bagged with #2. Is it wise to leave the books sealed together? Just curious. I know it’s probably a rookie question, but would like to hear your opinions. BTW got it for a cool 25 cents, so I don't think I did to badly.
you realize that's ONLY the blue cover for #1, right?
You got one book (#2) and one cover (#1) there.
Issue #1 was printed with the "wrong cover", so they shipped the "right cover"
bagged with issue #2.
If you want to resell them in the next couple of years, you should probably
leave them bagged. For the long term, though, it won't make any difference,
but I'm not sure what we're supposed to do with that "loose cover".
-
ManofTheAtom
- Deathmate was cool
- Posts: 13366
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:19 pm
- Location: Mexico City
- Contact:
You sure it was printed with the "wrong cover"?
Dynamic Forces sold a version of U2K #1 with the "right" cover.
Was the copy that was printed with the "wrong" cover meant to be for Dynamic Forces while the cover in the DF version the one meant for the comic stores?
Dynamic Forces sold a version of U2K #1 with the "right" cover.
Was the copy that was printed with the "wrong" cover meant to be for Dynamic Forces while the cover in the DF version the one meant for the comic stores?
Comics are like a Rorschach test, everyone has a different opinion on what they are and can be... -
x-omatic
- Did someone call for a Hired Gun?
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 4:00 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
- Contact:
The printer printed the cover that was ment to be the limited one as the regular cover.ManofTheAtom wrote:You sure it was printed with the "wrong cover"?
Dynamic Forces sold a version of U2K #1 with the "right" cover.
Was the copy that was printed with the "wrong" cover meant to be for Dynamic Forces while the cover in the DF version the one meant for the comic stores?
http://chrismorrillart.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
ManofTheAtom
- Deathmate was cool
- Posts: 13366
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:19 pm
- Location: Mexico City
- Contact:
-
Todd Luck
- Doomed to forever roam the black halls
- Posts: 4729
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:02 pm
- Location: Winston-Salem, NC
x-omatic wrote:The printer printed the cover that was ment to be the limited one as the regular cover.ManofTheAtom wrote:You sure it was printed with the "wrong cover"?
Dynamic Forces sold a version of U2K #1 with the "right" cover.
Was the copy that was printed with the "wrong" cover meant to be for Dynamic Forces while the cover in the DF version the one meant for the comic stores?
LOL That's funny. I've never heard that. It's almost as good as Solar saying he had read a comic with himself in it as a kid in issue 2
(the editor put the wrong Solar comic in Seleski's hands) There was A LOT of disorganization at Accliam Comics at that time.