The 4-issue arc

Discuss the VALIANT comics, characters, and collecting.
PLEASE DO NOT REVEAL SPOILER INFORMATION IN YOUR TOPIC TITLE.

Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg

User avatar
nycjadie
Especially "dude." And "balls." Those terms work in the tech industry.
Especially "dude." And "balls." Those terms work in the tech industry.
Posts: 7391
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:38 am
Valiant fan since: Solar #1
Favorite character: Rai
Favorite title: Bloodshot
Favorite writer: Kindt
Favorite artist: Too many to choose.
Location: Virginia
Re: The 4-issue arc

Post by nycjadie »

The TPB changed the way people write comic books the same way cable television series and binge watching changed the way people write non-sitcom tv shows.

User avatar
David_Cody
One of few who have a circa 1993 Valiant tattoo
One of few who have a circa 1993 Valiant tattoo
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 11:06 pm
Valiant fan since: VH1 X-O 14
Favorite character: Sting
Favorite title: Harbinger
Location: Cody, Wyoming
Re: The 4-issue arc

Post by David_Cody »

Very interesting topic. I would consider myself to be an "old school" comic reader and collector. Back in the early 80's, I had Marvel mail me both Amazing Spider-Man and my fav ROM. I loved the fact that there wasn't this EXTREME Marvel event where I had to collect 100 issues to understand a story line.

Things were just simpler then and i.e.....better.

I personally do not like the four-issue story-arc formula. I have ZERO use for it. Just tell a damn story. Just tell it well and keep me interested from month-to month.

I have purposefully not bought many TPB's due to this reDONKerous paradigm.

But I realize, this is my opinion. :?

User avatar
Shadowman99
Clinkin' bottles with Aram
Clinkin' bottles with Aram
Posts: 2848
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 6:08 am
Valiant fan since: 2012
Favorite title: XO Manowar
Favorite artist: Clayton Crain
Location: England
Re: The 4-issue arc

Post by Shadowman99 »

david_albuq wrote:Just tell a damn story. Just tell it well and keep me interested from month-to month.
Totally with you on this one. Like I said before, I don't care if a particular arc takes a single issue to resolve or 100 - as long as it keeps me entertained along the way, make an arc as long as it needs to be.

Someone mentioned that 'mini arcs' in most VEI comics fall into a larger 'whole arc', and that this achieves the best of both. I don't disagree with this at all, but it still bugs me that to some extent the events of a portion of a 'whole arc' have to fit a 'mini arc' format for the sake of putting a TPB on the shelves. Perhaps my problem is with TPBs instead then - why can't TPBS have a non-standard format? Why can't any given TPB consist of three issues, or four, or five, or six, or seven, or eight, or ten (etc), or more to suit the story that's being told from start to end?
Kurt Busiek wrote:Bull$#!t

nonplayer
Rockin' out in Torquehalla
Rockin' out in Torquehalla
Posts: 2242
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:16 pm
Valiant fan since: back in the day xo#9
Favorite character: Momo, xo turok
Favorite title: Wrath of the eternal warrior
Favorite writer: Joshua dysart
Favorite artist: Robert Gill
Location: out for lunch
Re: The 4-issue arc

Post by nonplayer »

Gold key turok was a full story each issue and I loved it. It's a collection of adventures. Miss the old way. Really don't like 4 story arks but Like how valiant did the Valiant to go with a story.
I Miss the good old days.

User avatar
Bl00dsh0t
You gotta have Faith!
You gotta have Faith!
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:58 pm
Valiant fan since: Bloodshot #1 (2012)
Favorite character: Ninjak/Woody
Favorite title: Bloodshot/Ninjak
Favorite writer: Josh Dysart
Favorite artist: Clayton Crain
Location: The Faraway
Re: The 4-issue arc

Post by Bl00dsh0t »

I like one-and-done stories that have a beginning, middle, and end in a single issue that are still linked to a broader continuity and overarching narrative. The #0's fit this perfectly. Bloodshot #7 (the Harbinger hunter story pre Harbinger Wars) is another good example.

But like others - I just want something that keeps me coming back each month. If the titles are too trade focused I'm more likely to skip the monthly buys and pick up trades...(but I prefer the monthly format)

jasont215
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:36 am
Re: The 4-issue arc

Post by jasont215 »

Single issue stories don't translate as well to movies :)

User avatar
erwinrafael
H.A.R.D.E.R. Corps, with Extra Resistance
H.A.R.D.E.R. Corps, with Extra Resistance
Posts: 1047
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:29 am
Favorite character: Aram
Favorite title: Archer and Armstrong
Favorite writer: Fred Van Lente
Favorite artist: Pere Perez
Location: Philippines
Re: The 4-issue arc

Post by erwinrafael »

Shadowman99 wrote:
david_albuq wrote:Just tell a damn story. Just tell it well and keep me interested from month-to month.
Totally with you on this one. Like I said before, I don't care if a particular arc takes a single issue to resolve or 100 - as long as it keeps me entertained along the way, make an arc as long as it needs to be.

Someone mentioned that 'mini arcs' in most VEI comics fall into a larger 'whole arc', and that this achieves the best of both. I don't disagree with this at all, but it still bugs me that to some extent the events of a portion of a 'whole arc' have to fit a 'mini arc' format for the sake of putting a TPB on the shelves. Perhaps my problem is with TPBs instead then - why can't TPBS have a non-standard format? Why can't any given TPB consist of three issues, or four, or five, or six, or seven, or eight, or ten (etc), or more to suit the story that's being told from start to end?
Because it gives the TPB-only readers, the engine of growth of the dying comic book industry, a standardized product with a standard price and a standard length of content and a standard release date. The same way that you don't want your individual issue to change from 15 to 20 to 30 then 22 pages every issue, and shift from different prices every issue, TPB readers want to know what to expect every four months. Basically, the standardized TPB has replaced the standardized single issue.

User avatar
Shadowman99
Clinkin' bottles with Aram
Clinkin' bottles with Aram
Posts: 2848
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 6:08 am
Valiant fan since: 2012
Favorite title: XO Manowar
Favorite artist: Clayton Crain
Location: England
Re: The 4-issue arc

Post by Shadowman99 »

erwinrafael wrote:
Shadowman99 wrote:
david_albuq wrote:Just tell a damn story. Just tell it well and keep me interested from month-to month.
Totally with you on this one. Like I said before, I don't care if a particular arc takes a single issue to resolve or 100 - as long as it keeps me entertained along the way, make an arc as long as it needs to be.

Someone mentioned that 'mini arcs' in most VEI comics fall into a larger 'whole arc', and that this achieves the best of both. I don't disagree with this at all, but it still bugs me that to some extent the events of a portion of a 'whole arc' have to fit a 'mini arc' format for the sake of putting a TPB on the shelves. Perhaps my problem is with TPBs instead then - why can't TPBS have a non-standard format? Why can't any given TPB consist of three issues, or four, or five, or six, or seven, or eight, or ten (etc), or more to suit the story that's being told from start to end?
Because it gives the TPB-only readers, the engine of growth of the dying comic book industry, a standardized product with a standard price and a standard length of content and a standard release date. The same way that you don't want your individual issue to change from 15 to 20 to 30 then 22 pages every issue, and shift from different prices every issue, TPB readers want to know what to expect every four months. Basically, the standardized TPB has replaced the standardized single issue.
I absolutely appreciate what you're saying about people desiring a standardised product. I suppose my question now becomes 'Why can't or won't people break away from the idea of a standardised product'? I still just don't see why there *has* to be a standardised form for the telling of a comic book story. To me it's like trying to push a square peg through a round hole - it feels to me like there's a fundamental flaw in the practice that's obvious to me and just isn't apparent to others. I'm not saying that's the case of course, just how this idea 'feels' to me. I guess I ought to start reading indies instead of mainstream stuff :kidaround:

Also, if TPBs are the "...engine of growth..." for this industry, why don't comic companies just ditch the monthly format altogether and just publish TPBs instead? Why doesn't that happen?

Just to be clear I'm not trying to rub you up the wrong way here, I'm just trying to express my thoughts a bit and kick the conversational ball about a bit. I'm struggling to accept that things *have* to be done a certain way.
Kurt Busiek wrote:Bull$#!t


Post Reply