Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

A week-to-week plan is available for re-reading VALIANT from the beginning...
start anytime, go at your own pace.

Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg

Post Reply
User avatar
jmatt
Mmm, I was drooling over Cooshie tonight.
Mmm, I was drooling over Cooshie tonight.
Posts: 11026
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:41:10 pm
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA!
Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by jmatt »

Having just re-read it last night, I was wondering: What was to be gained by Rai #0?

We see the creation of Bloodshot and learn of his death at the hands of Ax.
We learn Archer and Flamingo married, and we learn of Archer's death.
We know when Shadowman dies and toward what cause.
We learn that Aram is never heard from again after Archer's death.
We know Pete Stanchek goes missing.
We watch Aric die, we know Aric posseses the armor into old age.
We learn how Harada can live indefinitely.
We see how Gayle dies.
We learn when Harada's forces are defeated.
We know how long the Hard Corps endured.
We see where the Blood of Heroes ends up.

Now, it's cool to tease fans with a future revealed. But doesn't it take a lot of the cliffhanger out of the characters and storylines? I think it really hamstrings future writers and editors.

Whaddya think? Was Rai #0 a clever reveal or did it in some way spoil the mystery?

User avatar
iwantvaliant
H.A.R.D.E.R. Corps, with Extra Resistance
H.A.R.D.E.R. Corps, with Extra Resistance
Posts: 1117
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:24:38 pm
Location: CT, USA
Re: Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by iwantvaliant »

This is a really good point. As a Valiant history enthusiast the issue is great for bridging the gap between the two time periods. But I can imagine how frustrating it must have been for the writers that the audience already knows what happens to the characters.

It would have been interesting to see if the writers and editors would have sticked with Rai #0 if the Valiant Universe had lasted.

Side note: Bob Hall did a great job writing a character who knew when he was going to die.
My podcast reviews the Valiant trades: http://vepodcast.wordpress.com/
And my timeline on the original Valiant Universe: http://valiantfans.com/vctimeline/

User avatar
kevinbastos
I felt 'used car salesman' kind of dirty.
I felt 'used car salesman' kind of dirty.
Posts: 3868
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:34:06 pm
Valiant fan since: 1992
Favorite character: Rai
Favorite title: Quantum & Woody
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:
Re: Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by kevinbastos »

iwantvaliantcomics wrote:
Side note: Bob Hall did a great job writing a character who knew when he was going to die.
Truly one of the most important notes. Even with closure coming, the mystery becomes more of a "howdunnit" than a whodunnit.
Hey, look! I have a podcast!
And a Website!
http://www.valiantnewuniverse.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


If I win an argument, it doesn't mean I'm right. It means I'm a better arguer.

In addition, I'm right.

User avatar
myron
I do embrace my inner geekdom
I do embrace my inner geekdom
Posts: 16277
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 10:37:59 am
Valiant fan since: 1991
Favorite character: Gilad
Favorite title: Pre-Unity Harbinger
Location: watertown, wi
Re: Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by myron »

kevinbastos wrote:
iwantvaliantcomics wrote:
Side note: Bob Hall did a great job writing a character who knew when he was going to die.
Truly one of the most important notes. Even with closure coming, the mystery becomes more of a "howdunnit" than a whodunnit.
exactly...

and all the twists and turns that can take you along the way...
Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?

User avatar
dbngaa
You gotta have Faith!
You gotta have Faith!
Posts: 918
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:54:50 am
Location: Memphis adjacent
Re: Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by dbngaa »

Yea, I don't think it would have hamstrung them too much if they didn't want it to. I heard somewhere that time was not absolute, so they could have written themselves out of it. It's a great epilogue to the pre-Unity era, and most of the events were so far in the future (other than Shadowman's death), that there was no pressure to get there anyway.
This post has been carefully constructed so as to add absolutely nothing to any discussion or topic.

User avatar
Heath
The Saints will win the Super-Bowl!
The Saints will win the Super-Bowl!
Posts: 11527
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:05:06 pm
Valiant fan since: 1992
Favorite character: VH1 Shadowman; VEI X-O
Favorite title: VH1 Shadowman; VEI X-O, Harb
Favorite writer: Bob Hall; Dysart, Van Lente
Location: Torque's Hundred-Yard-Long New Orleans Saints' Themed Dining Hall
Re: Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by Heath »

Sometimes, showing the ending of the story first, then going back and showing HOW everything got to that point is a very effective storytelling technique. Rai #0 certainly isn't the first example of that. And it doesn't hamstring good writers. Bob Hall was a great example.

No, I don't think Rai #0 spoiled anything. I think it added significant suspense and mystery to the Valiant universe and, to this day, is still a masterpiece.
I would agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

User avatar
kevinbastos
I felt 'used car salesman' kind of dirty.
I felt 'used car salesman' kind of dirty.
Posts: 3868
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:34:06 pm
Valiant fan since: 1992
Favorite character: Rai
Favorite title: Quantum & Woody
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:
Re: Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by kevinbastos »

dbngaa wrote:Yea, I don't think it would have hamstrung them too much if they didn't want it to. I heard somewhere that time was not absolute, so they could have written themselves out of it. It's a great epilogue to the pre-Unity era, and most of the events were so far in the future (other than Shadowman's death), that there was no pressure to get there anyway.
Absolutely.

I also remember multiple occasions throughout the Shadowman run that Nettie referred to the future NOT being set in stone. Only a possibility.
Hey, look! I have a podcast!
And a Website!
http://www.valiantnewuniverse.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


If I win an argument, it doesn't mean I'm right. It means I'm a better arguer.

In addition, I'm right.

User avatar
MarrowMan
Clinkin' bottles with Aram
Clinkin' bottles with Aram
Posts: 2993
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:21:01 am
Valiant fan since: 1991
Favorite character: ShadowMan
Favorite title: ShadowMan
Favorite writer: Dysart, Jordan
Location: Toronto Canada
Re: Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by MarrowMan »

Image
Image

User avatar
FormerReader
I spoke with Dino and he said you can divulge all information to me.
I spoke with Dino and he said you can divulge all information to me.
Posts: 3754
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:15:58 pm
Location: Florida
Re: Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by FormerReader »

jmatt wrote:Having just re-read it last night, I was wondering: What was to be gained by Rai #0?

We see the creation of Bloodshot and learn of his death at the hands of Ax.
We learn Archer and Flamingo married, and we learn of Archer's death.
We know when Shadowman dies and toward what cause.
We learn that Aram is never heard from again after Archer's death.
We know Pete Stanchek goes missing.
We watch Aric die, we know Aric posseses the armor into old age.
We learn how Harada can live indefinitely.
We see how Gayle dies.
We learn when Harada's forces are defeated.
We know how long the Hard Corps endured.
We see where the Blood of Heroes ends up.

Now, it's cool to tease fans with a future revealed. But doesn't it take a lot of the cliffhanger out of the characters and storylines? I think it really hamstrings future writers and editors.

Whaddya think? Was Rai #0 a clever reveal or did it in some way spoil the mystery?
I think it was very brave. It made for a great story and made the characters more interesting.

User avatar
jmatt
Mmm, I was drooling over Cooshie tonight.
Mmm, I was drooling over Cooshie tonight.
Posts: 11026
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:41:10 pm
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA!
Re: Re-thinking Rai #0 from an editorial perspective

Post by jmatt »

I don't necessarily disagree with you guys from a reader's perspective. My question is posed from an editorial perspective.

Valiant hires Peter David in 1996 to write, I dunno, any of these titles. You don't think his hands are tied with readers knowing exactly how Bloodshot dies?

Yeah, it's comics and they can retcon anything they want; "oh, that was a doppleganger of Gayle that died...", but even so, from a writer's perspective that's gotta take away a lot of storyline possibilities.

As a big X-O fan at the time, I can remember being *SQUEE* :!: that I now know how his story ends.


Post Reply