Where'd the girl go?

slym2none · Post by **slym2none** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:54:59 pm

Daniel Jackson wrote:I thought we were done with this.

Almost.

-slym

Daniel Jackson · Post by **Daniel Jackson** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:56:05 pm

slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:I thought we were done with this.
Almost.

-slym

Are we talking in months or years?

slym2none · Post by **slym2none** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:57:11 pm

Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:I thought we were done with this.
Almost.

-slym
Are we talking in months or years?

Hopefully minutes... we are in the chat now.

-slym

Daniel Jackson · Post by **Daniel Jackson** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:00:44 pm

slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:I thought we were done with this.
Almost.

-slym
Are we talking in months or years?
Hopefully minutes... we are in the chat now.

-slym

Don't come out till you shake hands or hug, your choice.

Zero · Post by **Zero** » Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:36:15 am

slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:I thought we were done with this.
Almost.

-slym
Are we talking in months or years?
Hopefully minutes... we are in the chat now.

-slym

Awesome!

I really hope you two got your misunderstandings cleared up.

ZephyrWasHOT!! · Post by **ZephyrWasHOT!!** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 1:10:30 am

slym2none wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:You think I got "bent out of shape."

WRONG, but I will never convince you.
Your words and actions say otherwise.
What, sarcastically posting a picture in three threads is "bent out of shape?" Your reaction to my reaction was seemingly much stronger.

You think I "spazzed out."

WRONG, but I will never convince you.
Whatever you wanted to call it, the fact is, you had a NEGATIVE reaction to my random and harmless thread de-rail.
Well, don't go and randomly "gay up" someone's thread, anyone's thread. We have sections here just for such things. It was un-neccesary. And your all-caps of "negative" was seemingly much stronger of a reaction than my real one.

You think I am trying to tell ANYONE what to think or experience.

WRONG, but I'll never convince you.
Wait....wait a minute....I thought you NEVER TELL SOMEONE ELSE YOU KNOW WHAT THEY'RE THINKING....

And yet, you're doing it here...

Which is perfectly FINE, in the way you've presented it, but not only is it incorrect (you're not trying to TELL anyone ANYTHING, but you ARE shaping your comments to make it APPEAR as if I do something [thinking I know what others do/think/feel] that you would NEVER do, thus setting yourself up as my moral superior. This is psych 101, bub), it's what YOU claim you "never do"...claim you know what someone else is thinking. You JUST did. Oops.
Every response to such allegations could be claimed to be doing the exact thing the other person is accusing them of. You claimed I was "leading the jury" when I said I was letting everyone decide for themself, then you went and seemingly "led the jury" with this response :

No you're not! You're not at ALL! You are trying to CONVINCE them that *I* think I know everything! You're trying to get everyone to believe that *I* think I KNOW what you are thinking/feeling (everybody KNOWS what you are DOING, you cannot HIDE public ACTIONS!), when, in fact, I am merely INTERPETING (correctly) what you are thinking/feeling through YOUR OWN WORDS AND ACTIONS.
That's not what I was doing at all, but it may have seemed that way to you.

I am really tired of trying to convince you that what you think and what really is CAN BE and a lot of the times ACTUALLY IS two different things. You are so far off-base with your conclusions, but I will never convince you of that, and I know that.
You jumped to the conclusion that I was screwing with you in your thread. I wasn't. You then retaliated because you thought I was. I wasn't. You're then claiming you did no such thing. You did, and the evidence is still there for everyone to see.
No, you jumped to THAT conclusion, that I was jumping to a conclusion. I wasn't. And my so-called "retaliation" was simple sarcasm - I notice how you left out my paraphrasing of your post "It happens to every thread." Well, it doesn't HAVE to happen to every thread, and there was no lead-up to that anyways. Usually, there is a joke or a comment that can be mis-construed as "gay," but this wasn't the case.

Now you're going on and on and on and on ad nauseum about something that's not even RELEVANT to the discussion ("I can't convince you how WRONG you are.")

You don't need to CONVINCE anyone of anything. Just let live or die by your words, and stop trying to paint me as someone who's completely devoid of reason, huh?
Nothing I have brought up here is irrelevant, at least in my eyes. And I have NEVER tried to "paint you as someone who is completely devoid of reason." That would be stupid to try. So, once again, conclusions were jumped to prematurely.

There has been no harm done here, no foul, once again a big misunderstanding. Just because there's a disagreement, doesn't mean there's a "good guy" and a "bad guy." I'm not trying to make you look like the bad guy, but it seems to me you are trying to do so to me. Let's call this as a misunderstanding, no bad guys involved.

OK?

-slym

I'm gonna say this, and then that's all I'm gonna say: it was a completely random and harmless act of thread vandalism. It happens everywhere, all the time, to almost everyone, on almost every thread. I, personally, am of the opinion that it is OK to happen anywhere (no one OWNS a thread except Greg), and am not offended when someone "gays up" ANY of my threads, or otherwise derails it in any way...because they're not MY threads.

But I understand that there are some people who are offended by "things that derail their threads", which is why I seldom respond to those people in any way, much less to "derail" their threads.

But it was harmless. So. Now that we've established that, let's move on.

Unblessed · Post by **Unblessed** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:16:50 pm

ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:

What was the issue again? I missed it. Must not be important.

Anyway, where are all the cool chicks?

leonmallett · Post by **leonmallett** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:20:19 pm

Unblessed wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:

What was the issue again? I missed it. Must not be important.

Anyway, where are all the cool chicks?

leonmallett · Post by **leonmallett** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:20:55 pm

leonmallett wrote:
Unblessed wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:

.

ZephyrWasHOT!! · Post by **ZephyrWasHOT!!** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 1:44:36 pm

Unblessed wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:

What was the issue again? I missed it. Must not be important.

Anyway, where are all the cool chicks?

Yeah, whatevah.

slym2none · Post by **slym2none** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:17:20 am

No, no... it's

"Yeah, whatever, queer."

-slym (Daniel Tosh rules!)

ZephyrWasHOT!! · Post by **ZephyrWasHOT!!** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:31:17 am

slym2none wrote:No, no... it's

"Yeah, whatever, queer."

-slym (Daniel Tosh rules!)

Yeah, whatever.....queer.

slym2none · Post by **slym2none** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:39:51 am

Unblessed gets it...

-slym (seriously, Daniel Tosh rules)

ZephyrWasHOT!! · Post by **ZephyrWasHOT!!** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:15:13 am

slym2none wrote:Unblessed gets it...

-slym (seriously, Daniel Tosh rules)

I didn't *not* get it.

Soooooo much is lost in translation around here....

cobra_commander · Post by **cobra_commander** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:15:42 am

slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:I thought we were done with this.
Almost.

-slym
Are we talking in months or years?
Hopefully minutes... we are in the chat now.

-slym

You guys need to "chat it out"?

slym2none · Post by **slym2none** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:08:02 pm

ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:Unblessed gets it...

-slym (seriously, Daniel Tosh rules)

I didn't *not* get it.

Soooooo much is lost in translation around here....

Apparently... as my post was a joke as well.

-slym

ZephyrWasHOT!! · Post by **ZephyrWasHOT!!** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:30:39 pm

slym2none wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:Unblessed gets it...

-slym (seriously, Daniel Tosh rules)

I didn't *not* get it.

Soooooo much is lost in translation around here....

Apparently... as my post was a joke as well.

-slym

No, MY post was a joke, you non-joke getting joke killer!!!

Daniel Jackson · Post by **Daniel Jackson** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:54:53 pm

Alright, you jokers and non jokers, be nice.

Elveen · Post by **Elveen** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:32:36 pm

Daniel Jackson wrote:Alright, you jokers and non jokers, be nice.

slym2none · Post by **slym2none** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:05:41 pm

ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:
ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:
slym2none wrote:Why did the chicken cross the road?
Chuck Norris said he was hungry for KFC.
Why did the dead baby cross the road?
It was stapled to the chicken.

So, it was just all one big joke? Jeez, nothing ever changes around here...

-slym

slym2none · Post by **slym2none** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:07:55 pm

Elveen wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:Alright, you jokers and non jokers, be nice.

I see a joker... what about a non-joker?

-slym

Chuck · Post by **Chuck** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:14:52 am

slym2none · Post by **slym2none** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:56:44 pm

C'mon... at least Gallagher is self-explanatory.

-slym

ZephyrWasHOT!! · Post by **ZephyrWasHOT!!** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:27:52 pm

I'm a joker...I'm a toker....I'm a midnght smoker.....

Daniel Jackson · Post by **Daniel Jackson** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 5:41:09 pm

ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:I'm a joker...I'm a toker....I'm a midnght smoker.....

Somehow I can't picture the last two....