ValiantFans.com Board - Since 2004

Daniel Jackson wrote: I can see them thinking that this will cast them in a bad light and pull the plug on the entire deal.

I'll take that bet!

Maybe I'm a Pollyana, but I think we'll be hip deep in these comics by this time next year.

myron wrote:aren't these things proof read before they're submitted???

My favorite one is that Illustrated Media does "customs" comics, which are probably about etiquette or immigration, I guess.

Non-competes are hard to enforce. I think it was mentioned elsewhere, but you can't prevent someone from making a living by telling him not to use his professional skills. If someone is a painter by profession and that's the only thing he knows how to do, you can't tell him he can't paint and make ...

SolarGod wrote:It doesn't even sound like what VEI had with Classic Media was an agreement , no ? They are basing their argument on what THEY believe was going to happen. Not on anything that actually DID happen.

But they did a comendable job of making it seem like a deal...

Smoke and mirrors?

Am I incorrect in thinking that a confidentiality agreement does NOT equal an employment contract? Seems like VEI was quick to protect their interest by having Shooter sign the confidentiality agreement, but maybe not so quick to have Jim sign a contract to protect his financial interest and his ...

wow thats a beast but if its true VE has a good reason to be mad

I'm glad to see this posted for all to read, but the biggest part about what you said is " IF it's true."

Lke any suit, this are allegations .

The party making the allegations, whether true or not, has every incentive to make them ...